Video: “On the World’s Front Pages” — Journalism in Times of Crisis

The human brain is organized to want to see reality in the form of stories. —Monika Bauerlein

In the fall of 2012, author and former editor of Mother Jones Adam Hochschild visited CHF for his program with Monika Bauerlein (then co-editor and currently CEO of Mother Jones) on Writing for an America in Crisis. The 2012 presidential election was just days away. The defining news story was Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s now-infamous “47 percent” comments about "entitled" voters he accused of "believing that they are victims" and depending on the government. It feels like we are living in a time that will change the world, Bauerlein noted at the time.

Nearly eight years later, with seven months to go before the next presidential election, we are again living through a period that will change the world. Only now, the biggest news story isn’t about a person. It’s about a virus.

In the midst of 24/7 coverage of the COVID-19 global pandemic and how it will continue to change political and cultural narratives, we revisited Hochschild’s conversation with Bauerlein and identified three timely takeaways: living through a turbulent historical moment inevitably changes us, traditional journalism practices have a place in the digital age, and future historians will be influenced by what is documented now.

Living through a turbulent historical moment inevitably changes us.

As a journalist and historian Hochschild asks: “What was the experience that opened someone’s eyes?” The answer to this question is found in primary sources: “Thanks to the records that people have left behind, you can put a finger on a particular experience or a particular moment” when a person had a revelation that “changed how they felt about something.”

Traditional journalism practices have a place in the digital age.

Bauerlein asks: Are traditional journalistic narratives possible in the digital age? Hochschild thinks so: in a world where everyone has instant access to “the facts of the days news in an almost up-to-the-minute way,” that means you have to tell your story with craft in order to draw the reader in, “to show how people’s lives are being impacted by whatever is the subject at hand.” Studying heaps of data and charts is not enough, in other words: we still need stories to understand information in a human context.

Future historians will be influenced by what is documented now.

The writing of history is dependent on “who has left a record of what they were doing [and] thinking,” explains Hochschild. This means that those who have the access, ability, and privilege to document their life will be the sources most easily accessible to historians:

“When I choose characters, it’s because I can find their voices in the past. And this becomes a challenge because the voices that you can find are not always the voices that you would like to find.” —Adam Hochschild

“It’s much easier to find voices of the rich than of the poor, of white people than of Black people, of slave owners than of slaves, than of colonizers than of the colonized,” Hochschild said. But journalists and historians can and should write about the voices that are harder to find.

The Takeaway for Right Now

“Do future historians a favor and keep your letters.” —Adam Hochschild

Keep a diary. Write letters (or emails) to friends, snap photos on your phone. It might just feel like hurried notes in between teleworking, homeschooling kids, or taking walks around the block, but documenting our everyday lives is important for shaping historical narratives.

header image credit | Unsplash